The Hero Complex

Welcome to the jungle: Mixed reaction to "Avatar" trailer

VIDEO: "Avatar" interviews with Sigourney Weaver and Jon Landau

Leona Lewis is hoping 'Avatar' song will be a 'Titanic' success

Peter Jackson: Movie fans are fed up with the lack of original ideas

The late Stan Winston and the tricky business of Legacy

The "Avatar" videogame will follow its own path through the alien jungle

Leona Lewis is hoping 'Avatar' song will be a 'Titanic' success

Geoff Boucher — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:20:30 -0800

"AVATAR" COUNTDOWN: 27 DAYS

James Cameron's decade-long quest to deliver his sci-fi epic "Avatar" to moviegoers is nearing its climax. We're counting down the days to the Dec. 18 release with daily coverage here at the mighty Hero Complex. Today we consider the sound of "Avatar," specifically the theme song by Leona Lewis.

In late 1997 and early 1998, as "Titanic" sailed into box-office history, there was no escaping the film even if you never walked into a movie theater -- Celine Dion's recording of "My Heart Will Go On" was a massive hit and spent 10 weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard radio airplay chart.

"My Heart Will Go On" won the Oscar for best song and also won Grammys in the marquee categories of song of the year and record of the year. The melodramatic hit, the biggest of Dion's platinum-plated career, propelled the film and vice versa -- and now Cameron and the "Avatar" team are hoping for a similar sort of synergy with the Leona Lewis recording of "I See You," the theme that will play over the closing credits of the sci-fi epic.

It's hard to imagine anyone could catch that "Titanic"-style lightning in a bottle twice, but Cameron has some familiar faces helping with the attempt. Oscar-winning composer James Horner (who shared the songwriting credit on "My Heart Will Go On" with lyricist Will Jennings) was brought into the studio as a producer on the Lewis recording, as was Simon Franglen, who was one of three credited producers of the "Titanic" track.

Lewis is a 24-year-old British singer with considerable success -- she is a three-time Grammy nominee, one in the prestigious record of the year category for her hit "Bleeding Love" -- and she was in London last week filming a video for "I See You" with U.K. director Jake Nava. Nava has worked with artists as diverse as the Rolling Stones, Britney Spears, the Cranberries and System of a Down but may be best known for two of Beyoncé's signature hits, "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" and "Crazy in Love." Lewis has been in Los Angeles this week for an especially busy trip, with appearances Thursday on "The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien" and "The Ellen DeGeneres Show" and Friday on the outdoor stage of "Jimmy Kimmel Live"; tonight she will sing on the American Music Awards on ABC.)

I haven't heard the song yet but I do know that "I See You" gets its title from an expression of respect and connection used by the Na'vi, the tribe of giant blue-hued aliens who lived on the troubled moon of Pandora in "Avatar." We'll have an interview with Horner here at the Hero Complex later this week and get some details about the Lewis sessions and the song, as well as his score for the off-world adventure. The album "Avatar: Music from the Motion Picture" goes on sale Dec. 15.

-- Geoff Boucher

RECENT AND RELATED

Txantstewä Fpìlfya -- that's how you say Hero Complex in Na'vi

Jim Cameron as cinema prophet: "Moving a mountain is nothing"

Sam Worthington looks for the humanity of "Avatar": "I don't want to be a cartoon"

Beyonce wants to lasso the role of Wonder Woman

U2 show at Rose Bowl has a fanboy backbeat?

Keef! Backstage at Scream 2009 with Keith Richards

The "Avatar" videogame will follow its own path through the alien jungle

James Cameron on "Avatar": Like "Matrix," it opens doorways

Welcome to the jungle: Mixed reaction to "Avatar" trailer

The late Stan Winston and the tricky business of Legacy

Photo: Leona Lewis. Credit: Associated Press

Avatar: The Game will follow its own path through the alien jungle

Geoff Boucher — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:12:25 -0800

"AVATAR" COUNTDOWN: 28 DAYS

James Cameron has big aspirations for "Avatar," and here at Hero Complex we're stepping up with some epic coverage plans: a 30-day countdown. Today's topic: Hero Complex contributor Gerrick Kennedy reports on the Ubisoft video game that hopes to take the fans of the sci-fi epic on an entirely different adventure.

Security is intense these days at the Montreal offices of Ubisoft where more than 200 employees are working overtime to put the final touches on the new James Cameron's Avatar: The Game, which is due to hit store shelves Dec. 1.

"The bunker" is how Patrick Naud, the executive producer of the game, referred to the area for the team dedicated to the creation of a 3-D gaming experience that matches Cameron's ambitious film project. Cameras, guards, extra locks and some fairly scary employee contracts have all been put into place to protect the game that looks to be one of the most intriguing releases of 2009.

“We’re just finishing the last production for the PC version,” Naud said. “From then on it’s just waiting for the game to come out. We’re hoping people get as excited about the game as we are.”

Cameron has been on a quest to make the "Avatar" film for more than a decade and there's plenty of curiosity considering the massive success of his last feature film, "Titanic" in 1997, and the industry chatter about the film's innovations in 3-D and visual effects technology. Naud and his team hope to create a video game that is also a potential “game-changer,” as the film is being billed by industry observers.

“We met James three years ago," Naud said. "That first meeting was so that he could approve us. We wanted to expand the world and we didn’t want to do a game of the movie. We didn’t want to have the boundaries of having to follow the film.”

Naud, like many of the collaborators working with Cameron on "Avatar," spoke with excitement in his voice about the director and his years-in-the-making epic. Ubisoft, though, has followed a different path through the alien jungles created by the Oscar-winning director's script and film.

“We had an idea what we wanted to do," Naud said of his company's pitch. "There were two main concepts: doing the game of the world, not the movie, and giving the players the choice to choose sides. We felt in the beginning of the project there is a big part of the story that’s not told.”

The film follows the adventure of a Marine named Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) who is sent to the distant moon Pandora, where, given control of a towering, blue-hued alien body, he is supposed to gather intelligence about an alien race who lives atop valuable natural resources. After learning the ways of the Na'vi tribe, though, Sully finds himself wondering which side of the impending conflict he belongs on.

With Cameron’s blessing, Ubisoft Montreal created its own storyline set two years before the events of the film. In the game, players take on the role of Abel Ryder, a code breaker sent to Pandora. There they enter the Avatar Program, which creates the alien-human hybrid bodies, like the one used by Sully in the film. Players are then faced with a choice: Side with the noble Na’vi or work for the Resources Development Administration, the armed human enterprise planning to mine Pandora's coveted minerals.

Naud said game developers wanted to challenge themselves more after Cameron asked why the game couldn't be 3-D like the movie. Although Naud assured gamers it’s not needed for game play, he says gamers who do have a DLP setup that supports 3-D vision, or a 3-D-vision capable flat-screen TV, will have the bonus of experiencing the game much like they would the film.

Nintendo users will also experience the game differently as the Wii and Nintendo DS games follow their own story lines, separate from the other platforms.

“Play as a young Na’vi warrior whose village and family have been destroyed by the RDA, you’re seeing it from this different perspective,” Naud said. “It uses the Wii balance board and the MotionPlus that was released this summer. Something we felt was a nice addition.”

Naud said that Cameron realized the potential the video game has to strengthen the “Avatar” brand and that the filmmaker approached his relationship with the game creators in a collaborative manner that Naud said is far from the norm in the film-based game sector.

“It’s not the type of relationship we have with a licensor," Naud said. "Some studios might want to be more protective of their characters. It’s not everyone that sees it as an extension of the brand. Some see it as a way to get more revenue. We had the liberty to create new characters, new worlds. He knew of games, but he didn’t know what made a game great. He trusted us. He told us to 'go all in.'”

-- Gerrick Kennedy

RECENT AND RELATED

Txantstewä Fpìlfya -- that's how you say Hero Complex in Na'vi

Jim Cameron as cinema prophet: "Moving a mountain is nothing"

Sam Worthington looks for the humanity of "Avatar": "I don't want to be a cartoon"

Giovanni Ribisi loves Jim Cameron

James Cameron on "Avatar": Like "Matrix," it opens doorways

Welcome to the jungle: Mixed reaction to "Avatar" trailer

VIDEO: "Avatar" interviews with Sigourney Weaver and Jon Landau

Peter Jackson: Movie fans are fed up with the lack of original ideas

The late Stan Winston and the tricky business of Legacy

Jim Cameron as cinema prophet: "Moving a mountain is nothing"

USC professor creates an entire alien language for 'Avatar'

Geoff Boucher — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:15:22 -0800

"AVATAR" COUNTDOWN: 29 DAYS

James Cameron has big aspirations for "Avatar," and here at Hero Complex we're stepping up with some epic coverage plans: a 30-day countdown. Today's topic: The USC professor who found himself on an unexpected Hollywood adventure when he was hired to create the language spoken by aliens on Cameron's distant planet of Pandora.

This modern era of moviemaking has plenty of peculiar challenges for actors -- on green-screen sets, for instance, they have to watch a ping-pong ball hanging from a string and convince the camera that they actually staring down some magical beastie -- but for the actors auditioning for "Avatar" the biggest challenge may have been reading a sheet of paper with words invented by a USC professor named Paul R. Frommer.

Frommer, a linguistics specialist, was brought in by "Avatar" writer-director James Cameron to create an entire functioning language for the tribe of 10-foot-tall blue aliens who inhabit Pandora, the setting for the film's conflict. Frommer tackled the project with glee -- "How often do you get an opportunity like this?" -- but the actors who had bend their tongues around the invented vocabulary and syntax were slightly less charmed by the experience.

"Oh, it was so hard and I was really concerned about it," said Zoe Saldaña, who portrays an alien named Neytiri in the sci-fi adventure that opens in theaters Dec. 18. "I didn't think I could get through it. I'm not good with languages. All the actors, we worked together. It was the only way."

Frommer has spent four years laboring on the language of the Na'vi tribe and his work will not end on the day of the film's release. He plans to keep expanding the language until he's, well, blue in the face.

"I'm still working and I hope that the language will have a life of its own," the professor said. "For one thing, I'm hoping there will be prequels and sequels to the film, which means more language will be needed. I spent three weeks in May, too, working on the video game for Ubisoft, which is the name of a French company. That's not a French word, though, I don't know where they got Ubisoft."

Frommer is clearly delighted by his unexpected excursion into the Hollywood dream factory, which has the buttoned-down academic working side-by-side with movie stars and hobnobbing with an Oscar-winning director of Cameron's stature. Sitting on a concrete bench near the bustling center of USC campus, he recounted his Tinseltown labors with verve; the only time a hint of disappointment crept into his voice was when he explained that his alien language was limited by the terran larynxes of Sam Worthingon, Saldaña, CCH Pounder and other cast members who spoke the Na'vi language.

"The constraint, of course, is that the language I created had to be spoken by humans," Frommer said. "I could have let my imagination run wild and come up with all sorts of weird sounds, but I was limited by what a human actor could actually do."

Between the scripts for the film and the video game, Frommer has a bit more than 1,000 words in the Na'vi language, as well as all the rules and structure of the language itself. "I'm adding to that all the time," said Frommer, who says he would like to see the new tongue catch on in the way that Klingon has become a studied language among especially, um, engaged fans of "Star Trek."

"Oh, I'm very aware of Klingon," Frommer said the way a sports coach might analyze a rival with a long winning tradition. "It was created by a linguist [named Marc Okrand] and it is very, very well put together. I actually once developed a problem for students in analysis using data from Klingon. When I started working on this, though, I deliberately did not look at Klingon so I wouldn't be unconsciously influenced by it."

Frommer's fondest wish is that the language takes off and that fans of the film use the Internet and conventions to spread the sound of Pandora. "It's definitely doable for people, and so many people have learned Klingon, so there could be an interest," he said. To some ears, Klingon sounds like a cross between Russian and crawfish, but the Na'vi language is far more gentle on the ear. "Cameron wanted something melodious and musical, something that would sound strange and alien but smooth and appealing."

Frommer is a linguist by trade and got his PhD at USC, but after he finished his doctorate he left acadmeia for the business world. "I really wanted to teach, though, and came back." He ended up on the faculty of the Center for Management Communication at the Marshall School of Business and teaching in the area of clinical management communication -- but he concedes that, deep down, his true love is still for language and pure linguistics.

When "Avatar" producer Jon Landau and his company, Lightstorm, approached the linguistics department at USC with Cameron's proposition about creating an extraterrestrial tongue, the request quickly found its way to Frommer, who had once collaborated on a workbook that collected data from 30 languages.

"The e-mail that came my way that said they were looking for someone who could create an alien language for a major motion picture directed by James Cameron, but the name of the project at that time was Project 880," Frommer said. "As soon as I saw that e-mail I pounced on it."

Frommer didn't start completely from scratch; Cameron had come up with about three dozen words of the Na'vi language at that point in his project document, which was like a quasi-script or a long treatment ("They called it a scriptment," Frommer said, "and that was a new word to me") but most of the words were character names.

"It gave me a sense of the sound that he was looking for and then I expanded it. Given these sounds and the possible combinations, what further structure could I bring to the sound to make it interesting," Frommer said. "That was the starting point. Probably the most exotic thing I added were ejectives, which are these sorts of popping sounds that are found in different languages from around the world. It's found in Native American languages and in parts of Africa and in Central Asia, the Caucasus. "

Frommer prepared three "sound palettes," which were collections of words and phrases that did not have meaning but did have the cadence and feel of languages. Cameron mulled over the sound files and picked the third as the best fit for the world he wanted to hear. He did not want tonal differences and variations in vowel length, for instance, but he loved the ejectives.

Then came the heavy lifting -- nailing down the sound system, word construction, the rule of syntax -- and Frommer immersed himself in the thousands of decisions required, many of them deciding what goes in and what goes out. The Na'vi language, for instance, does not have the sounds buh, duh, guh, chu, shu, and by restricting the sounds, Frommer said, a characteristic shape of the language begins to distinguish itself.

"If you allow everything and the kitchen sink, you get a mishmash, it sounds like gibberish," Frommer said. "An analogy is cooking and deciding how you are going to spice up a certain dish. If you put everything you have on the shelf, you get a mess. If you are judicious you get something good. In language, sometimes things are defined by the absences."

The finished product sounds, to some ears, vaguely Polynesian, while others hear the rhythms of African languages in it. "Someone said it sounded German to them, someone else told me Japanese, and I think that's good. If everyone were saying one single language then it would be bad," Frommer said.

Frommer worked with the actors at the studios of dialect coach Carla Meyer, whose credits include all three "Pirates of the Caribbean" films, "Angels & Demons" and "Erin Brockovich" as well as "Air Force One," in which she helped Gary Oldman shape his hijacker's Eastern European accent. Frommer was impressed with the actors' intensity of focus.

"I was surprised they all did very well, and it gave me hope, too, that other people will try to learn it and speak it," Frommer said. "I'm excited because there is going be a Pandora-pedia online and a lot of material for people to learn more about the planet. There's this incredible devotion to detail. It's been fascinating to me. It's almost academic in its approach."

Frommer finds himself walking the campus sidewalks and talking to himself in the language. He has attempted to write poetry, too. It wouldn't be surprising if some of his couplets were forlorn -- it's lonely being the only person speaking a language. "I just wish," he said, "that I had someone to talk to."

-- Geoff Boucher

RECENT AND RELATED

Sam Worthington looks for the humanity of "Avatar": "I don't want to be a cartoon"

Giovanni Ribisi loves Jim Cameron

James Cameron on "Avatar": Like "Matrix," it opens doorways

Welcome to the jungle: Mixed reaction to "Avatar" trailer

VIDEO: "Avatar" interviews with Sigourney Weaver and Jon Landau

"Avatar" coming to a theater near you . . . and sooner than you think

Peter Jackson: Movie fans are fed up with the lack of original ideas

The late Stan Winston and the tricky business of Legacy

'New Moon' premiere shines in Westwood

Photos: Top, USC professor Paul Frommer (Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times). Middle, James Cameron and Sam Worthington at work on "Avatar" (Twentieth Century Fox). Bottom, Cameron on the set (Twentieth Century Fox).

Taylor Lautner on Rob Pattinson: 'Sadly, we don't hate each other'

Geoff Boucher — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:22:20 -0800

In May, Hero Complex contributor Gina McIntyre traveled north to Vancouver, Canada, to visit the set of "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" and talk to the creative minds behind one of the most anticipated films of 2009. This week, as we count down to the release of the vampy sequel -- which is now screening everywhere -- McIntyre gives us daily dispatches from her trip. Today's final post in the series is a Q&A with Jacob Black himself, 17-year-old actor Taylor Lautner.

GM: I understand you did a lot of your own stunts in the film.

T.L.: Yeah, I’m very lucky. I’m thankful that the stunt coordinators have some interest in me and they actually trust me. I got to do all my dirt bike riding. A lot of times I’m just standing on set and I’m looking around going, "What can I do that will look really cool and will give me some action in this film?" I’ll usually just find things and ask them if I can do it. They’re like, "Taylor, you can’t get hurt, but OK, go ahead." That’s where most of the stunts come from, but I’m really surprised they let me do all the dirt bike riding myself.

GM: Had you done that before?

TL: No, not really, I did it when I was a little kid like once but then when I heard that they were wondering if I knew how to dirt bike ride before I came up here, I met with a friend of mine in L.A. who has some dirt bikes and did two practice days. I had a couple of practice days up here with the stunt guys and then just shot it. I don’t know how cool it looked, but I didn’t get hurt.

GM: What other stunts did you dream up for yourself?

TL: Jacob, in the books he’s described pre-transformation as very clumsy and he trips over his own feet. As soon as he transforms [into a werewolf] he becomes very agile. That’s what I wanted to show in the film. At first he’s just a normal kid, jogs up to Bella, then when he transforms all of a sudden he’s just hopping around the place, has incredible balance, can do cool things. So if we’re in the middle of a forest, I’ll be like, What can I hop over? What can I hop off of? How can I show Jacob’s agility after his transformation into a wolf?

GM: How distressing was all the talk of whether you’d come back for in the role for "New Moon" and when did you start taking steps to prove that you could continue on as the character?

TL: I knew when I was filming "Twilight" that Jacob’s character goes in a different direction. He transforms not only mentally and emotionally but physically as well. As soon as I was done filming "Twilight," I literally got home and that day I went into the local gym and was like, I need a trainer because I need to get to big. I moved around gyms quite a bit and moved trainers and finally found one that I worked with the whole time almost. It required a lot of dedication, the fans and the whole series and the character motivated me, and I did it. It was a lot of hard work. I had to be in the gym a lot and I had to eat a lot, but I’m very thankful that I did it because it’s definitely worth it now.

GM: How long did it take?

TL: About a year.

GM: How many hours a day did you work out?

TL: It kind of differed. Now, it’s best for me just to do about an hour and a half at most a day because there was this one period of time where I put on a lot of weight and then all of a sudden I started losing it. I was dropping weight and I was like, "What’s going on, why am I losing all this weight I put on?" What I found out is that I was actually overworking myself. I was not taking days off. I was just going seven days in a row and I was in the gym for 21/2 hours a day. I was just burning more calories than I was taking in, so I was losing weight and that’s definitely not what I needed to do.

GM: Were you on a specific diet?

TL: At one point, my trainer was literally like, "We need to get some fat on your body so then we can transfer that fat into muscle." I was 71/2% body fat and we just couldn’t build upon that. He would be like, "Eat as much as you can. We just need to get calories in your body." That was for a short period of time. Definitely when it got closer to filming, it was strictly meat and protein and vegetables, egg whites. It’s not that bad at first, but when you have to have it every morning, then it starts becoming disgusting. And you have to be eating every two hours. It’s horrible. Everybody’s like, I’d kill for that job, to eat as much as possible. I’m like, go for it. For a year, you have to eat every two hours and very specific things; you try, see if you like it.

GM: What else did you do to prepare for the role?

TL: I think the best way possible to prepare for the role is by reading the books because that’s what we’re going off of and we should be going off of those because that’s what the fans love so much. I read the book a couple of times before filming and I was really excited because Jacob’s character in "New Moon," he’s like a split personality. Half of the time, toward the beginning, he’s pre-transformation Jacob, where he’s just very sweet, very lovable, very outgoing. As soon as he transforms, he becomes a totally different person. I wanted to bring both of those sides of him to life. Also, it’s described in the book, he has three faces. That first face, the second face and his third face is called the combined face, that’s where he is the new kind of conflicted Jacob. But Bella sees through him to what he used to be and what she would love him to come back to. You have to bring all three of those faces to life.

GM: How challenging was that?

TL: The most challenging part was some days I’ll actually film all three faces on one day. I’ll have to, in the morning, pop the wig on and be happy-go-lucky little Jacob and then after lunch I’ll have to rip the wig off and take all my clothes off and become scary, mean, conflicted Jacob. I’ll have to switch on a dime. That’s probably the most challenging part, but all actors love challenging themselves with their roles. Jacob’s definitely a great role to do that.

GM: How much of yourself do you put into the character?

TL: I’d say a lot. What’s crazy is you actually become the character. It helps being surrounded by such talented actors, Kristen [Stewart] and Rob [Pattinson], and having an amazing director in Chris Weitz. It really helps.

GM: Would you say that you have a lot in common with Jacob?

TL: In some ways. Jacob loves people, he loves being around people. I would say that’s similar to me.

GM: What was it like to work with Chris Weitz on "New Moon" after working with Catherine Hardwicke on "Twilight"?

TL: Chris is so amazing. All the cast thinks so. We all get along so well and he’s so talented. It’s so relaxed. We’re not stressed and worried, but at the same time the outcome is great. Chris is so talented and easy to work with, I’d work with him for the rest of my life if I could. We did tons and tons of rehearsals with him, diving into the script... The fact that I was surrounded by Kristen [Stewart] and Chris and everybody behind us was a major help for those extremely emotional scenes.

GM: How would you characterize your relationship with Kristen?

TL: It’s so funny. We have such a similar relationship to Bella and Jacob. We’re very close. We get along so well. We’re so open with each other. We can talk about anything. We can be completely open and honest with each other and discuss anything and everything whenever we went. We were always discussing Jacob and Bella’s relationship.

GM: What about the other members of the wolf pack? Did you do some pack bonding?

TL: We did a few nights. They weren’t up here a ton, but when they were we went out to dinner, I went out to a movie with them and they’re really great guys. They are a lot of fun. They keep the set alive. They’re funny, they got energy.

GM: And Rob?

TL: Sadly, we don’t hate each other. We definitely can switch that on and off. It is fun. I have nothing against the guy, I think he’s great, but when you’re living Jacob and I’m experiencing that pain and I know that he’s in the way of what I want, then it’s really not that hard to be pretty [annoyed] at him.

GM: Have you gotten accustomed to the frenzied fan reaction that the series inspires?

TL: I don’t know if you can get used to it. You can’t really get surprised anymore because you’ve seen just about everything. We understand and have seen all of the passion and dedication in the fans so it’s not like we’re going to see something crazy and be like, "Wow, we have crazy fans." We know that. It’s fantastic. We wouldn’t be here without them but they’re everywhere. You’re always experiencing the fans. Sometimes it does get a little overwhelming. I don’t know if you get used to it or not.

GM: How many times have you been asked about the status of the "Breaking Dawn" movie?

TL: A few times, and I wish I could give an answer. I really do.

-- Gina McIntyre

RECENT AND RELATED

LA TIMES REVIEW: "New Moon" not as good as first film

'Twilight' producer: Lautner is going to blow people away with his acting

"New Moon" and "Lawrence of Arabia"? Let Chris Weitz explain

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'backup plan'

Photos: Top, bottom, "New Moon" premiere. Credit: Associated Press; second from top, Taylor Lautner. Credit Spencer Weiner/Los Angeles Times; third from top, "New Moon" scene. Credit: Summit Entertainment.

Giovanni Ribisi pretty much loves Jim Cameron

Geoff Boucher — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:20:21 -0800

"AVATAR" COUNTDOWN

It's 30 days until the opening of James Cameron's "Avatar," and here at Hero Complex you will find more insight and information about the film than anywhere else; today marks the start of our daily countdown coverage leading up to the much-anticipated epic adventure. Will the film live up to the industry billing of "the game-changer" for Hollywood special-effects movies? Today we start the countdown with a conversation with Giovanni Ribisi, one of the stars of the movie, who could not talk enough about director Cameron.

GB: This is feeling like a movie that people have circled as something that has a chance to be very special. What was the feeling during the making of it?

GR: It's been an extraordinary experience within all aspects of the film. As far as filmmaking goes, and I hate to sound pretentious about it, but this movie is kind of historical. For Jim to pull this off and the amount of time he spent on the technological aspects, the story, it's relevance to today's world -- all of it. It was an incredible thing to be there down in New Zealand. And it's one of the best countries in the world, so that was amazing too, to be down there for five months.

GB: You were in "Saving Private Ryan," another film that was a massive canvas, major spectacle and had a long running time. That film was judged a success by most people because it held on to its humanity and life stories in the middle of those huge moving parts. Do you consider that the challenge of "Avatar" as well?

GR: I think from a director's point of a view and a production company, it's one of the various parts that make up the actual final whole. There's music, there's editing, there's lighting, acting, there's directing, choreography -- films are this all-encompassing medium. With this film, all of the technological aspects and how advanced the 3D is and how futuristic the computer graphics are, all of that loses its importance if you don't have a good movie. I think that's one of the great things about Jim; one of the reasons I respect him is that he is unrelenting in making it a good movie, even setting aside all of those things. From what I've seen it's incredible on an emotional level and on a storytelling level. Jim is a visionary on that level as well, which is why I wanted to work with him.

GB: You were in "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow," one of the first "digital backlot" films. Does that suggest you have an interest in seeking out movies that reach for the "next" tech in visual storytelling?

GR: For me it's not about genre. I don't really care about that. For me, it's the story, the script and the people involved in making the movie. That's the most important thing. For any of the hundreds of people working on it, making a film is a large commitment out of your life and you have to have your interest maintained, whether it's two months or two years for "Apocalypse Now" or 12 years for Jim on "Avatar." And he's set a standard that others, I hope, will try to meet.

GB: What can you tell us about your character, Selfridge?

GR: Without giving too much away, it's obvious from the trailers that we as a company have gone to colonize another planet to exploit its natural resources. Essentially, I can give you two viewpoints on my character. The character's viewpoint on himself, and my viewpoint. He is a cog in a machine but he considers himself the pharaoh of this new world. He's running the ship and it's all a statistical thing for him; he's about results and numbers. He has the sickness of what our capitalistic, corporate version of the American dream can become.

GB: He has ledger fever ...

GR: Yes exactly, the ledger fever.

GB: Cameron has said he looked to classic tales by Rudyard Kipling and Joseph Conrad and more modern epics such as "At Play in the Fields of the Lord" and "Dances With Wolves" to construct a story for "Avatar." That's interesting to consider...

GR: Yes, absolutely. In storytelling there is a basic structure that you can trace back. If you analyze Shakespeare and his plays, the foundation is Aristotle's "Poetics," and that treatise that Aristotle wrote 2,500 years ago still resonates on such a human level. There are essential, elemental parts to storytelling and drama. And there's something about "Avatar" that really sort of articulates all of that and gives it an emotional resonance. And I don't think anybody really does it quite like Jim. When something is epic, it's epic in a way that you've never quite seen before and you feel an emotional attachment to the characters. It doesn't matter if they're CG or live-action, you're right there with them.

GB: You mentioned the time spent in New Zealand working on the film -- can you give me a snapshot memory from the set or perhaps even sort of an emotional memory of working on the project?

GR: It's funny, Jim likes to say that New Zealand is the country that America always wanted to be in its early days. Now I don't know how people are going to take that, how offended they're going to be -- I don't know how many letters you're going to get. But I agree with him. They literally have commercials on television that tell people to get out of the couch, turn off the TV and get outside. Everything about the place -- the education, on a cultural level, socially, the landscape and their awareness of the environment and their effect on it. It's not a country steeped in litigation and lobbyists.

GB: One last thing: You've worked with directors like Steven Spielberg, Michael Mann, Sam Raimi and the late Anthony Minghella. It's an impressive list. When you consider a project, do you find you give more weight to who the director is in comparison to other factors? And are there directors in particular you'd like to work with?

GR: In process, you start with the script usually because that's normally how you become aware of a project. But a picture is only as good as the director is talented, and a picture is only as good as a director's vision for it. It is definitely the most important thing to me. For me, the people I'd love to work with, well, Jim would be at the top of the list. Working with Jim again. And ... well, just Jim, I think that'd be my answer to that.

-- Geoff Boucher

RECENT AND RELATED

Jim Cameron as cinema prophet: "Moving a mountain is nothing"

Sam Worthington looks for the humanity of "Avatar": "I don't want to be a cartoon"

James Cameron on "Avatar": Like "Matrix," it opens doorways

Welcome to the jungle: Mixed reaction to "Avatar" trailer

VIDEO: "Avatar" interviews with Sigourney Weaver and Jon Landau

"Avatar" coming to a theater near you . . . and sooner than you think

Peter Jackson: Movie fans are fed up with the lack of original ideas

The late Stan Winston and the tricky business of Legacy

Berkeley Breathed's "Bloom County" regrets

Photos: Giovanni Ribisi in "Avatar," and then shown with co-star Sigourney Weaver. Credit: 20th Century Fox.

NOTE: DUE TO AN EDITING-PROCESS ERROR, A PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS POST WAS PUBLISHED WITH NUMEROUS TYPOS. WE APOLOGIZE.

Missing Nemo: Berkeley Breathed says new movies are missing magic and drowning in pixels [UPDATED]

Geoff Boucher — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:49:38 -0800

GUEST ESSAY BY BERKELEY BREATHED

Last week, at the precise moment on screen that millions of screaming, tanned Angelenos tumbled down into a mile-deep cataclysmic crack in the planet’s exploding crust along with their high-rise condos and labradoodles, a man’s phone rang in the row of seats behind me. In a voice rising even above the sound of continental plates and Hummers scraping on each other, he discussed dining options with his caller.

“Szechuan!” he spouted. “It’s spicy!”

I looked around at my fellow multiplexers. I’d need help strangling him. I only had licorice twists. But the others didn’ t seem to notice his conversation. Worse: They didn’t care.

As I studied their faces, lit up with the shockingly realistic images of their own burning city disappearing down into the bottomless black depths of both hell and the accounting department of Columbia Pictures, I spied a common expression on them all. No, no, not rapt fascination or terror. But not exactly boredom either. Something else. It took me a moment to identify: Numbness.

Then this thought: HungryBoy behind me would not have taken that call in 1954 if he’d been watching the tentacles of a giant squid wrapped around the riveted tail fin of the Nautilus submarine, yanking James Mason toward its snapping, slobbering maw amidst a howling Technicolor typhoon. Sorry. No way.

In 1954, the only numbness in that theater would have been in beguiled eyeballs, extended out from skulls an inch more than normal.

With the release of “20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" 55 years ago, Walt Disney stumbled upon a mostly unexplored emotional response from movie audiences. This unique feeling had been lurking in cinema’s murky, black and white depths, waiting to emerge and attack moviegoers and their imaginations in a way that tears, laughter and fear – the emotions of radio, theater and books -- could neither match nor compete: Awe.

As in Awesome.

Awe as in slack-jawed and struck dumb: The Red Sea parting before C. Moses Heston. Steven Spielberg’s mothership rising behind Devil’s Tower, reducing it in scale to an overturned Frappuccino. The Imperial Star Destroyer lumbering over our heads in the first seconds of "Star Wars." Each provoked a collective, adolescent “whoooa” from dazzled audiences. Remember that sound? I do. Heard it lately? Many of you just watched Africa slide over and smash into Brazil on screen last weekend. What’d you hear?

I heard, “Szechuan! It’s spicy!”

Awe. From the latin Awesemonus, or Aw, man did you see that? A subjective reaction to visual stimulus that would, like that giant squid — the most tenacious of sea beasts — wrap itself around the Hollywood blockbuster until finally, reluctantly letting go in the late 1980s. It was hit square between the eyes with not a harpoon but something far deadlier: A pixel.

The blockbuster remains busting ever bigger blocks every weekend. But with the smothering ubiquity of magical computer effects in even commercials selling products to battle talking toe bacteria, too often we emerge from the modern action spectacular pummeled and numb, the only residual awe being in yawn. Or awful. Or prawfits.

By now, we and our children — flooded daily with pixels — have simply seen it all. Yawn.

Or too much. Numb.

The old school, spine-tingling adolescent movie wonder may have had its last gasp somewhere in the neon-lit hallways of Darth Vader’s Death Star… but I submit that it was born, fresh, new and exciting, in the dank blue steel passageways of Captain Nemo’s Nautilus, decades before.

Now, it’d by churlish not to suggest that lots of respectable, fantastic stories had found their way to film by then. I’m sure you remember 1951's “Flying Disc Man from Mars.” And no, I don’t forget 1933’s King Kong. Nor do I forget Willis O’Brien’s smudge of lunch peanut butter on Kong’s two inch shoulder in one shot. I can see it. Please don’t write me.

Without real movie stars, without meaty themes of war and loss and villainous angst, without saturated color and Cinemascope, without the budget, the exotic shooting locales and sweeping elegiac score and without much concern to hide the black wires holding the spaceships up … neither awe nor wonder nor even atomic-powered Victorian submersibles could fully surface below the lid of cheese that capped that era’s typical science fiction cinema.

That in mind, Walt Disney and director Richard Fleischer risked the entire fate of the Disney studio, as well the plans to build Disneyland, in rolling the budget dice -- flinging them, really -- at Jules Verne's classic but plotless novel. It was Walt’s first live-action picture, his inexperience reflected by a talky, episodic script that couldn’t, for the first time, fall back on the crutch of a comedic sidekick cricket or dwarf.

All forgiven though, with the other cinema luxury he delivered that was otherwise unseen in the fantasy genre up to that point: razor-cool production design. Nemo’s outrageous ship, spontaneously carved from a foot-long piece of pine by Disney designer Harper Goff one inspired spring day. That marvelous, malevolent submersible of anti-war vengeance that looks like what every kid knows a proper submarine should resemble but does not: A pissed-off fish alligator.

Fifty-five years later, it’s what everyone remembers. Poor Kirk Douglas.

My mother -- who remembers nothing from film -- thinks that “20,000 Leagues Under the Sea” is a motto on cans of tuna fish. And she swears on the lives of her dogs that Spartacus simply could NOT have kissed a seal in any movie.

But she knows she’s seen that submarine before.

Kirk may have chewed up the scenery in every shot, but he couldn’t take a bite out of the dominating profile of Goff’s wonderful underwater sub -- native warriors leaping off its electrified cannibal-repelling hull as it sliced through both the Pacific ocean and the movie-soaked cerebellums of young boys like me.

Full disclosure: The home office in which I’m presently writing this has been fashioned after the interior design of the Nautilus – all paneled colonial cherry wood, faux arched steel I-beams overhead, steam tubes, rivets, red velvet upholstery and flickering Victorian lights. A suitable creative environment for an arrested adolescent but one also compelled to cook up fantastic stories and call it respectable work.

Where better, I ask, than within the romantic innards of the Nautilus?

A padded cell, my wife would answer.

Alas, no pipe organ, but my outer studio doors feature a child-repelling electric current that is always switched on. (This is wholly believed within the family and I’d like to keep it that way.)

Ever anxious to bury an ironic lead, I should add that with the 55th anniversary of "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea," Disney’s new studio head Rich Ross just sank the nearly-to-production revival of Captain Nemo.

It would have been stuffed like a haddock, no doubt, with CG spectacularityness. I sort of suspect it would have been all Disney could do to resist the temptation of showing Captain Nemo destroying, in photo-real detail, the entire solar system.

And maybe, just maybe, they sensed this. And maybe they came back up to the surface to take a breath and rethink just exactly whence the wonder of their new Nemo movie should flow: From the dazzling story, characters, production design and — did I mention story?

Or from its CG images of computer-processed, over-the-top liquid action?

Go. Hold your breath and dive deep, Disney. But remember, we’ve pretty much seen it all before.
And probably in a Depends commercial.

-- Berkeley Breathed

Berkeley Breathed is a Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist, illustrator, novelist and screenwriter. A Disney adapation of his book "Mars Needs Moms!" will be released in 2011. He lives in Santa Barbara, and, in a home office designed in homage to "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea," looks out on the sea and waits for Nautilus to surface.

RECENT AND RELATED

Disney deep-sixes "20,000 Leagues" revival

Berkeley Breathed says Opus is "alive and well"

Breathed will end Opus: "I'm destroying the village to save it"

Director McG hopes "Terminator" will get his career back on course

Is the "Pirates" franchise sailing into rough waters?

Surprised author Tim Powers finds himself aboard "Pirates" ship

Photos: Vintage images courtesy of Disney. Bottom: Berkeley Breathed and his dog and his bike. Credit: Mark Boster / Los Angeles Times.

UPDATED: An earlier version of this post misidentified the author of "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea," but an angry squid fixed it.

'New Moon' review: The movie misses Robert Pattinson ... and Catherine Hardwicke

Geoff Boucher — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:23:09 -0800

"TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

It's almost here, Twi-hards. Today, in our ongoing daily countdown to "The Twilight Saga: New Moon," we bring you the review of the film by Los Angeles Times film critic Kenneth Turan, who believes the film suffers from the absence of Robert Pattinson and the mad-love sensibilities of Catherine Hardwicke.

"This is the last time you'll ever see me," Edward Cullen says to Bella Swan. As if.

Spoken early on in "New Moon," that promise is one of the least likely to be kept in movie history. With most of that film still to unfold, and two more adaptations of Stephenie Meyer's "Twilight" series in the works, the next due out as soon as next summer, the world is going to see as much of Kristen Stewart's melancholy Bella and Robert Pattinson's undead Edward as it can take. Maybe more.

In the short term, however, Edward is as good as his word, and "New Moon" suffers as a result. Constrained by the plot of the novel, the film keeps the two lovers apart for quite a spell, robbing the project of the crazy-in-love energy that made "Twilight," the first entry in the series, such a guilty pleasure.

"New Moon," which has been grandly titled "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" in honor of that first episode's huge success, marks the franchise's entrance into the self-protective, don't-rock-the-boat phase of its existence, which is inevitable but a bit of a shame.

In place of "Twilight" director Catherine Hardwicke, a filmmaker of intense, sometimes overwhelming and out-of-control emotionality who seemed to feel these teenage characters in her bones, "New Moon" has gone with the more polished Chris Weitz.

A smooth professional whose credits include such adaptations as "The Golden Compass" and "About a Boy," Weitz makes the vampire trains of Melissa Rosenberg's capable script run on time, but he almost seems too rational a director for this kind of project. This lack of animating madness combined with the novel's demands give much of "New Moon" a marking time quality.

Yes, I know, "New Moon's" emotional energy is supposed to come through Bella's putative attachment to newly buff best friend Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner). But though audiences gasp when Jacob uses his shirt to staunch Bella's blood (don't ask) and reveals a torso that would make Charles Atlas swoon, the connection between these two is so self-evidently non-romantic that it turns out not to be much of a diversion.

More interesting is Jacob's discovery that as a member of the fierce Quileute tribe he is prone to turning into an exceptionally large wolf at a moment's notice, a wolf whose main objective in life is to safeguard humans from vampires. In addition to pining for Edward, Bella suddenly finds herself in the middle of age-old and bitter enmities. This is one hard-luck young woman...

THERE'S MORE, READ THE REST

RECENT AND RELATED

'New Moon' premiere shines in Westwood

'Twilight' producer: Lautner is going to blow people away with his acting

"New Moon" and "Lawrence of Arabia"? Let Chris Weitz explain

Stephenie Meyer breaks silence on 'Oprah'

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'backup plan'

Photos: Top, Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner in "New Moon" (Summit Entertainment); bottom Launter and Stewart arrive for the film's Westwood (Matt Sayles /Associated Press).

The complex notion of destroying the world in '2012'

Jevon Phillips — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:18:52 -0800

Scene Stealer

Liesl Bradner has interviewed many of the masters of Hollywood effects in our Wizards of Hollywood section of Hero Complex and today takes a look at a particular moment during "2012" in this installment of Scene Stealer.

The disaster film "2012" reunites director Roland Emmerich and visual effects supervisor Volker Engel, who first worked together 13 years ago on another end-of-the-world movie, "Independence Day." How apocalyptic times have changed. The key destruction scenes in that earlier film consisted of 90% miniatures, a common practice when things need to be blown up, leaving only 10% of the elements to be computer-generated.

By comparison, nearly half of "2012" is visual effects. Because of the complexity of the destruction scenes it was impossible to use miniatures.

"The limo-in-earthquake was the most challenging scene, as it could not be shot at all but had to be completely created in the computer with inserts of the actors reacting to the mayhem," said Engel from Berlin, where he is collaborating with Emmerich on "Anonymous," a quiet Shakespearean drama.

Except for a few shots of a real limo filmed against a blue screen, the five-second crane shot in a residential neighborhood was completely virtual. The bird’s-eye view of the neighborhood buckling with every crumbling house, swaying palm tree, fence, car, sidewalk, garbage can and the limousine were all computer-generated because each one of those elements had to be simulated to shake, break or tumble.

-- Liesl Bradner

RECENT AND RELATED

"2012"explodes with $225 million worldwide

Roland Emmerich on L.A.: "It's always fun to lay it to ruin"

Review: Good actors struggle with "2012's" "ungodly language"

Scientists fuming about "2012" hysteria

Roland Emmerich promises "2012" is the "mother of all disaster films"

PHOTOS: David Strick on the set of "2012"

The mysterious messages of "2012"

Rate the music video for this "2012" single by Adam Lambert

Is Percy Jackson's mythology too close to Harry Potter's magic?

Geoff Boucher — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:49:51 -0800

Here at the Hero Complex, we've circled "Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief" as a project to watch next year, so we'll bringing you lots of coverage of its odyssey as a Hollywood venture. Today, Rachel Abramowitz has a report on the similarities between two magical youngsters, one named Percy and the other named Harry. -- Geoff Boucher

In February, moviegoers will get a chance to meet a character who is already a titan of the bookshelves: Percy Jackson, the rebellious 12-year-old hero of Rick Riordan's bestselling novels, who discovers that he is the demigod son of the Greek sea god Poseidon. But will newcomers to the saga find themselves thinking of a certain boy wizard who discovered his own supernatural heritage within the walls of Hogwarts?

The first Riordan novel, "Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief," was published four years ago, but it remains a hot gift for youngsters this holiday season. It starts off the tale of young Percy, a kid with a flair for sarcasm, getting in trouble and bouncing among schools. He also has been diagnosed with ADHD and dyslexia and has a somewhat defeated attitude about his future. It turns out, though, that his brain is wired differently because of his secret heritage: In this story, the Greek gods are alive and well and living on Mt. Olympus, which is now located on the 600th floor of the Empire State Building.

Instead of Hogwarts, this boy hero is shuttled off to Camp Half Blood on Long Island, where he communes with other young demigods. Once there, he’s wrongly accused of stealing the thunderbolt of Zeus, and if he doesn't find it, there will be a bloodbath among the famously quarrelsome clan of immortals. In the odyssey that follows, Percy discovers his own powers and faces down a bevy of beasties from Greek mythology. The studio executives working with the film are prepared for comparisons to "Potter," but they say they're confident that this adventure hero has plenty of his own unique magic to offer.

“We found it was a fresh arena," says Fox 2000 President Elizabeth Gabler, whose division is releasing the film. “It also deals with a lot of issues that kids and young people go through. Self-realization, breaking with the family, becoming more independent, finding out what your parents are, feeling a bit like an outcast and making yourself strong. There’s also an element of this which is a monster movie. The [kids] come up against Medusa, the Hydra, the Minotaur, Hades – people who are wild and extreme.”

Young Logan Lerman plays Percy, while Kevin McKidd ("Rome," "Grey's Anatomy") stars as Poseidon. The cast also includes Uma Thurman ("Kill Bill," "Pulp Fiction") as Medusa and Sean Bean ("The Lord of the Rings" films, "Troy") as Zeus, the king of the gods. The centaur Chiron, played by former James Bond star Pierce Brosnan, runs the activities at Camp Half Blood. Catherine Keener ("Capote," "Being John Malkovich") plays Percy’s mortal mom, Sally, whom he must rescue from the clutches of Hades, played by Steve Coogan, whom many moviegoers will remember as Octavius in the popular "Night of the Museum" films.

As the trailer makes clear, this film is directed by Chris Columbus, the director of the first two "Harry Potter" films and a producer of the third. Gabler said Columbus first heard about the books from his kids and then approached the studio, which owned the rights.

“He of all people was aware that there are some similarities to 'Harry Potter,' " Gabler said. "Who better than Chris to keep it away from that. He’s very sensitive to not repeat what they did in those films, and to bringing out the best of what these stories can be.”

-- Rachel Abramowitz

Chris Columbus feels pride watching his old "Potter" stars from afar

Hollywood looks to "Percy Jackson" and others to fill "Herry Potter" gap

Dan Radcliffe in "The Hobbit"? Star says thanks, but no thanks

Which celebrity intimidates Emma Watson? You may be surprised

Dumbledore diss? Michael Gambon sees "no point" in reading Rowling

Daniel Radcliffe talks about life after Hogwarts

"The Hobbit" is just the beginning of the del Toro Decade

Is "Pirates of Caribbean" franchise a sinking ship?

'New Moon' director says film was inspired by ... David Lean and Akira Kurosawa?

Geoff Boucher — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:22:00 -0800

"TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

In May, Hero Complex contributor Gina McIntyre traveled north to Vancouver to visit the set of "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" and talk to the creative minds behind one of the most anticipated films of 2009. This week, as we count down to the Friday release of the vampy sequel, McIntyre gives us daily dispatches from her trip. Today it's a Q&A with director Chris Weitz:

GM: I understand the scheduling on this film has been difficult.

CW: The thing is, you want to shoot in sequence if possible. The ideal movie, you would be shooting each scene in the order in which it occurs in the movie. But of course you have to go back and forth to locations and you'd rather shoot everything in the same place once you're there. One of the nice things about "Twilight," the first movie, was that all these kids got all this exposure so they get other movies to do and then we have to very carefully try to do this jigsaw of fitting people in when they're available. You end up shooting things crazily out of schedule, which is hard on the actors because they have to remember, Oh, this scene that I'm shooting actually takes place after scenes that we're going to shoot in two weeks and I'm supposed to be in this emotional state which follows that. It all gets very hard to organize mentally. In that sense it's one of the more erratic schedules that I've worked with but it's working out so far.

GM: With the werewolves coming to the forefront of the story in "New Moon," there are a number of visual effects in the movie. Your previous film, "The Golden Compass," also was very heavily dependent on computer-generated effects. Were you excited to tackle that aspect of this production?

CW: I have to say, I watched "Hellboy 2" the other day, and I thought, 'Wow, this guy really loves visual effects and he really, really, really knows how to stage them.' I'm not that guy. I know the right people who know how to stage them. I can't say that I relish them to the same degree that somebody like Guillermo del Toro does. That's not my thing. My thing is working with actors. I have been kind of hazed into the world of VFX, so I understand how to do that -- or at least who to trust -- and I get what it is that they're trying to do. I think that with the right visual effects supervisor, I can direct animators who are animating creatures, who are like actors in that sense. It's just that their performances are being done over the course of months. Each five-second shot takes months to develop. That stuff I like very much, but I wouldn't say that I'm either an expert or kind of a savant as far as that goes. That's Peter Jackson and Guillermo del Toro and Sam Raimi. That's not me.

GM: What most intrigued you about directing this film?

CW: It's kind of like the return of the repressed, this whole fantasy thing that's come along. I started doing comedies and then me and my brother [Paul] started veering towards drama and then "Golden Compass" came along and I just loved the book. With "Twilight," I'm not sure it's as much the fantasy per se as the emotionality of it. To me, it's kind of about loss and longing and breakup and reunion and all those sorts of feelings. The visual effects stuff and the fantasy stuff is great and it has to be done right, but it's not going to matter at all if it's not about people. Even the vampires are people. The moment you stop thinking about them that way, you just lose it and then you're making a tent-pole blockbuster movie. That's fine but that's not really my interest.

GM: What's it been like to come in on the second film in the series?

CW: For one thing it saved me the horror of auditioning -- I find auditions incredibly mortifying because it puts me in this really false position of judging people and I don't like doing that. I don't like saying no to people. I really feel for actors and the position they're in when they're auditioning for something and you have to say no to 95% of the people who come in. I hate that. So I inherited this really great cast and the cast to me is the strength of the movie. I also got some opportunities to go after some wonderful people I thought were great, and I also got some opportunities to cast people who hadn't been seen before -- like a lot of the kids who are playing the werewolves, some of them are doing it for the first time. One of the guys kind of walked in off the street, didn't even know what he was auditioning for and got a part, which is cool. Also I'm really grateful to ["Twilight" director] Catherine Hardwicke for having selected these amazing players and also for doing this movie that has so much interest attached to it. It's a really rare and wonderful feeling to know that people are going to want to see what you're making. The fear sometimes when you're making a film is that you've gotten everybody all dressed up with nowhere to go. What if nobody wants to see it or what if it's going to bomb? Certainly there is the possibility that I can really, really drop the ball and everyone's going to hate this and hate me for the job that I've done with it. But at least people are going to go and see it.

GM: Is that frustrating to know that you won't be doing the next film?

CW: You grow fond of people as you work with them and feel as though you would like to carry them on in their journey on the one hand. On the other hand, you also grow exhausted by the sheer grind of making a film and I think I need a rest. By the end of a movie and especially one that's being made at the kind of pace that we're doing it, I'm just going to be pummeled. I have a family and time has to be spent with my wife and kid. The whole family makes a sacrifice to make a film. As it happens, the way that things are scheduled, they're going to be going into pre-production while I'm still in post-production. There'd be no way for me to do it anyway, so there's that as well. It's kind of knowing that I'm here to carry the bowl of water and hand it on without spilling too much. It's OK. It's kind of what they did with [the] "Harry Potter" [franchise] where each film sort of had its own separate stamp but there's an aesthetic that ran through it and a cast.

GM: Did "Twilight's" visual aesthetic at all shape your approach to the look of "New Moon"?

CW: I wanted to approach it fresh. There is a point where it links up, which is in the school life of the main character, where we do maintain some of the hand-held quality of the camerawork. But I'm kind of old-fashioned in terms of my references. I go back to much more composed romances that I love. Those are my influences rather than what I think is a more pop contemporary sensibility that Catherine Hardwicke has. I don't think I'm very contemporary or cool. What will result is probably a much more romantic, classically framed old-fashioned epic for this one. We're going to these big sets and Italy, the world expands, the mythology of the piece expands. It fits better in a way with a sweeping approach, although one uses these metaphors really loosely. Sweeping, what does that mean? One hates to quote filmmakers who are great because it sounds like you're comparing yourself to them and I'm not at all, but David Lean and Kurosawa who composed on this grand level, that's the inspiration for this movie. It kind of has been for the last couple of movies for me in terms of building the visuals. "Golden Compass" was a biggie.

GM: How have your experiences with young actors on "About a Boy" and "Golden Compass" affected your approach to working with this cast?

CW: When you're working with Kristen [Stewart] and Rob [Pattinson], in a sense you're working with young actors but you're working with people who have worked quite a lot. Kristen's been working since she was a kid, so it's really like working with very experienced competent actors, which is a pleasure. Dakota Fanning, she's young but she's done more movies than I have. With Kristen too, she's extraordinarily aware of at what point in a scene you might cut in or out of something and that kind of thing. It's not like I'm working with coltish young people. They know what they're about.

GM: I understand that you put together a 20-page pamphlet that you gave to the actors at the outset of filming to help explain your ideas for "New Moon."

CW: I put it together about a week before the actors started arriving. It suddenly struck me that actors kind of get landed in a movie sometimes like paratroopers in a war zone and they’re just expected to fight their way out of it -- hey, this is the set you’re going to be on, this is your bedroom, this is the school that you go to, this is the forest that you live in. They don’t get time to acclimatize at all. I wanted to give the actors an insight into what I was thinking about the way it should end up looking, what the visual inspirations were. In part it was self-serving because you don’t want to have to explain what the heck is supposed to be going on when you could be shooting it. Part of it was just the sense that actors deserve a fair shake and to know what it is they're getting themselves into beforehand, what kind of world they’re going to inhabit because they’ve been working on their characters the whole time, which is great but they’re not necessarily attuned to the environment.

You hopefully have enough time to rehearse with your principals so you either feel comfortable with the script or you’ve been able to modify the script in ways that make them feel comfortable. But also I think it’s helpful for the people who are coming in for short periods even for smaller roles to know what it is that they’re going to be part of. They know the tone that’s been set for the movie as well. That it’s not jokey, that it’s not hyper stylized, that it’s fitting within a certain range. They even know what palette the colors of the movie are going to be in, which doesn’t necessarily impact upon their work, but they get the sense that people have been thinking a lot about what they’re going to be doing. We worked very hard to try to prep things for their arrival, they work hard to prep their characters and you want to meet in the middle.

GM: It might surprise most moviegoers to know that a director creates a color palette for a film.

CW: Nobody ever leaves the movie thinking, "That was a great color palette." People maybe think, "Oh that looked cool." But I think the devil is in the details or God is in the details, if you prefer, and I tend to hire on to work again and again with people who are obsessed with details so that even little things, things that are not surface, things that will be missed on first viewing, things that will be missed on second, third and fourth viewing, are gotten right. Because then you know if you’ve gotten even the minute details right then the stuff that’s right in your face is going to be right as well.

We had a set which functions for about 20 seconds – Jacob Black’s house that Bella storms through. Our production designer and his art director went down to La Push and met with the community there, so that when we constructed Jacob’s house, it looks like the kind of house that is on the La Push reservation. When the kids who were First Nations kids -- in America we call them Native American -- who were playing the wolves, first went and saw it, there was this kind of spooky moment. The guy playing Sam Uley told me, "It really kind of threw me because it looked like the house I grew up in. I was expecting my dad to come around the corner." That is really satisfying. I think the accumulation of detail is parallel to when you have a really good actor and they’re putting together a performance scene by scene and line by line. They think about it very carefully and we have to think about the visuals very carefully as well.

GM: You even used the camera differently to depict the characters' relationships ...

CW: The camera moves differently for different relationships. When we play scenes and Kristen and Taylor with Bella and Jacob, a friendly organic thing, those shots are all on Steadicam. It gives you a freedom from rigid axes, and it means you’re not always moving in straight lines, you’re always kind of fluidly moving around. As much as possible when she’s with Edward, we go on rails, on dollies, which means you’re moving in a straight line, you’re moving on an axis and the camera tilts or pans on specific axes as well. You might end up with the same kind of shot but behind it unconsciously -- and I think that people are so used to watching movies and TV now that they feel things even when they don’t necessarily know what it is that they’re feeling -- there’s a sense of rigidity to it and restraint. Then sometimes we would go hand-held with Bella’s relationship with her friends, which they did in the first movie.

In the first movie, a tremendous amount of it was hand-held. I’m not a huge fan of hand-held except in certain circumstances. I am a huge fan of Steadicam because it allows you incredible freedom. We also have one of the greatest operators in the world working with us, David Crone. There’s a grammar of camera movement if you wanted to be pretentious about it, which I guess I am being, that I also wanted to lay out at the beginning as well. It’s about detail. Anything down to the choice of the length of the lens you’re going to use actually affects the way that everything’s going to look -- whether or not you notice it, you’re going to see the degree of resolution of the background or not. There’s also the fact that we’ve been fighting the weather this entire shoot. We’re supposed to be shooting in a very rainy, gray environment and sometimes the sun is out, so sometimes we’re having to put up huge flags to cover entire bits of forest and then the one day where we want sun, it refuses to come.

GM: What has most surprised you about the cast?

CW: Their maturity surprised me the most given their age but on reflection I shouldn’t be because [Kristen and Rob] both have been working for a long time. But they’re remarkably clever and they keep me on my toes. They’ve thought about every line. Not that it’s my inclination to ever say, "Look, just do it, it’s a movie," but you can’t get one over on them. The surprising thing is that even though they’re playing vampires and werewolves and a girl who’s in love with a vampire, they still actually want to think about them as people, which is good, but their intelligence requires me to bring up my game quite a bit, which I’m willing to do.

GM: Have they had a lot of input into the script then?

CW: I sort of promised the actors at the beginning that no matter what, we would have time to discuss every single line. So that if things weren’t feeling right we would talk it over. We had a pretty nifty script to start with from Melissa [Rosenberg] but I can kind of work on the fly as well a bit because I’m a writer-director, which is helpful. I don’t feel stuck or panicky when an actor is not down with a particular piece of dialog.

GM: Does it impact you having Stephenie Meyer on set?

CW: Surprisingly positively, I say surprisingly because you’d think it would be terrifying to have the writer of the book on set – oh God, I’m going to get it wrong today. But she’s been remarkably kind of cool. I think she comes to the set as a fan of movies more than anything else. Early on, we had extensive and good exchanges. I believe she felt that I wanted to bring the book to the screen, not to make the second movie in a franchise. I’ve been adapting books for a long time now and that’s my main concern, this is a literary adaptation, it’s not a movie.

GM: Your last three films were literary adaptations. Is there something that draws you to stories originally told in novel form?

CW: I think it’s a lack of confidence in my own creative powers. I don’t believe my characters.

-- Gina McIntyre

PHOTO GALLERY: "New Moon," A to Z

'New Moon' premiere shines in Westwood

'Twilight' producer: Lautner is going to blow people away with his acting

Stephenie Meyer breaks silence on 'Oprah'

'Twilight: New Moon' exclusive: Three-dozen photos from the set

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'backup plan'

PHOTOS: From top, Chris Weitz; Weitz with cast members during filming; Taylor Lautner and Weitz on forest set of "New Moon." All by David Strick, Hollywood Backlot. At left, Lautner and Kristen Stewart arrive for the premiere. Credit: Matt Sayles /Associated Press

Losing Nemo: Disney deep-sixes McG's '20,000 Leagues' revival

Geoff Boucher — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:26:52 -0800

Remember McG's plan to bring Sam Worthington beneath the waves for a huge revival of Captain Nemo and "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea"? In a shocker, the whole film has been scuttled by Disney; Claudia Eller and Dawn C. Chmielewski have the latest at our sister blog, Company Town. Here's an excerpt:

In one of his first major creative moves as Walt Disney Studios' new movie chief, Rich Ross has made the costly decision to pull the plug on the planned $150-million production of "Captain Nemo: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" -- the last project approved by his predecessor, Dick Cook.

The movie -- which was a high-priority project for Disney and envisioned as a potential franchise along the lines of the "Pirates of The Caribbean" series -- was scheduled to begin shooting in February in Mexico. Disney had already spent millions of dollars hiring crews and building elaborate sets in Rosarito Beach, which will now have to be struck and workers laid off. The studio will also be shutting down the film's production offices on the Burbank lot, where dozens of people were doing prep work for the movie.

Just a few weeks ago, Disney spent generously to hire writer Michael Chabon to quickly rewrite the script. The studio had recruited Chabon, author of "The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay," to rework "Nemo" after he had recently written a draft of its forthcoming production "John Carter of Mars," the first live-action film to be directed by Pixar Animation Studios director Andrew Stanton.

As recently as late last week, the production of "Nemo" appeared to be full speed ahead...

THERE'S MORE, READ THE REST

RECENT AND RELATED

McG: We're bringing credibility back to "Terminator"

Director McG hopes "Terminator" will get his career back on course

For "Terminator" and "Trek" star Anton Yelchin the future is now

Worthington searches for "Avatar's" humanity: "I don't want to be a cartoon."

Sam Worthington, man or machine?

Depp: "There's a crack in my enthusiasm" for "Pirates" 4

Is the "Pirates" franchise sailing into rough waters?

Surprised author Tim Powers finds himself aboard "Pirates" ship

McG photo by Al Seib / Los Angeles Times.

'Twilight' mania hits Westwood with the premiere of 'New Moon'

Yvonne Villarreal — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:14 -0800

"TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

Yvonne Villarreal and Claudia Eller covered last night's big premiere for "Twilight Saga: New Moon." Here's their report...

It was a premiere so highly anticipated even the wolves came out. Literally.

About 3,000 people were invited to the premiere of "New Moon," the latest installment in the "Twilight" saga, held Monday at the Mann's Village, Bruin and Regent theaters in Westwood Village. But even the uninvited came out in droves. Thousands of screaming fans -- holding signs and snapping pictures -- crammed the sidewalks hoping for a glimpse of their favorite fang-toothed (or brawny, in the case of the werewolf fanatics) characters. Rob. Kristen. Taylor -- last names needed only for the uninitiated. They each made a point of approaching the screaming masses -- taking pictures, signing posters and shaking hands -- before making their way through the red carpet media frenzy.

The frenzy would pick up again once the ending credits to the sequel in the "Twilight" franchise, based on Stephenie Meyer's bestselling novels, began rolling. Between 1,800 and 1,900 invited guests filtered out of the theater and walked to the premiere's after-party, held at the nearby Hammer Museum. The modern space was transformed into a "Twilight" wonderland.

The film's St. Marco's Festival, celebrating the expulsion of vampires from Volterra, Italy, was re-created in the museum's interior space. Red lanterns dangled from the ceiling. Servers donned red cloaks. Even the menu took an Italian cue; the affair was catered by Wolfgang Puck -- naturally. There were even cupcakes with vampire teeth sunk into the frosting.

Meyer. Dakota Fanning. Ashley Greene. They all took in the sights of the make-believe Italy. Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner? They did too. But with security and velvet ropes to shield them from the masses.

The lush forests of Forks, Wash., also made an appearance. Off in the tented area, moss-covered rocks and leafy foliage filled the space. There were no signs of tree-climbing vampires. But two wolves (with wranglers) were prowling (behind a barricade) the scene -- keeping the vampires at bay.

-- Claudia Eller and Yvonne Villarreal

RECENT AND RELATED

'Twilight' producer: Lautner is going to blow people away with his acting

Stephenie Meyer breaks silence on 'Oprah'

Vampy sounds: Todd Martens reviews 'New Moon' soundtrack

'Twilight: New Moon' exclusive: Three dozen photos from the set

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'backup plan'

Photo: Taylor Lautner and Kristen Stewart arrive for the premiere. Credit: Matt Sayles /Associated Press

'Twilight' producer: Taylor Lautner is going to blow people away with his acting

Gina McIntyre — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:47:23 -0800

"TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

In May, Hero Complex contributor Gina McIntyre traveled north to Vancouver to visit the set of "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" to talk to the creative minds behind one of the most anticipated films of 2009. This week, as we count down to the Friday release of the vampy sequel, McIntyre gives us daily dispatches from her trip. Today, it's a Q&A with producer Wyck Godfrey, who's overseeing all the movie adaptations of Stephenie Meyer's novels.

GM: Stephenie is here on the set today -- has she been present for the majority of the shoot? How involved is she in the day-to-day production?

WG: In terms of authors being involved with their works as they turn into movies, she’s definitely on the more involved end of it, and that was a very purposeful thing on our part. When you do a beloved book and turn it into a movie, you’re beholden in some sense to the fans to really get it right. From our standpoint having her constantly there during preproduction, during the script stage, coming to production four or five times for really pivotal scenes, you have her as the person who created it constantly there telling you, "Know what? We might be missing this." It’s just great. She’s always supportive. It’s been a good presence. Whenever you make your decisions about directors or actors, you have Stephenie telling her fans, "I love this idea," and that means a lot to them and us.

GM: Did she have specific concerns about "New Moon"?

WG: The major thing is trusting that Jacob comes to the forefront in this movie. You need to have Edward depart so that you can allow Jacob to be that life preserver that he becomes for Bella, that friend that sort of pulls her out of her deepest despair. The instinct sometimes as a filmmaker, it’s like, OK, we’ve got Rob Pattinson, we need to put him in the movie as much as possible. In reality, the design of the book from a narrative standpoint works. The heartbreak of losing Edward in the first act, you won’t have it if he’s constantly present through the rest of the movie. Keeping the movie subjective, keeping it from Bella’s perspective [is important] because that’s how you experience it when you’re reading the books. That’s what everyone loves about the books. It’s really about Bella’s emotions and what she’s going through, those universal emotions that every girl and boy in some sense goes through at that age.

GM:Were you worried about Rob not being in the movie enough?

WG: Early on, there was that kneejerk reaction of, how are we going to work him into the movie? And we let go of it really quickly. At the end of the day, this is a movie about loss, about that greatest heartbreak ever. And you can’t have heartbreak if you keep the person around. Once we got the first draft of the script in, we realized, this is the right structure, this is fine. When you start to analyze it, he’s in a lot of the movie. He’s in the first act, he’s in the third act, it’s all still centered around her love for Edward.

GM: There had been some talk about whether to recast the role of Jacob because of the physical transformation the character undergoes between "Twilight" and "New Moon." But you opted to keep Taylor Lautner in the part. Why was that the right call?

WG: It was always the right call to keep him from a character standpoint because people connected to Taylor as Jacob in the first movie. The only thing that ever stood in our way was the physical description of Jacob in the second and third book. Taylor when we were making "Twilight" wasn’t the same Taylor that showed up when we were ready to start making "New Moon." He said, this is what I’ve done to work myself and do everything I can humanly do to make myself appear as the Jacob that is described by Stephenie Meyer in "New Moon." When you saw him and saw that he had physically transformed himself to a great degree – people will look at this movie and go, "Oh my gosh, I can’t believe that’s the same guy that was in 'Twilight.'" And that was really all that we needed to make sure happened because that is what happens in "New Moon." She does go, "Holy cow, Jacob, you look like a different person," and he’s like, yeah, well, it’s a growth spurt. It was one that from a practical standpoint we had to acknowledge as an issue when we were deciding to make "New Moon." It was going to be an issue, but he made it less of an issue by doing the work. It’s a real testament to his passion for the role, his commitment as a kid to do everything he physically could to become Jacob in "New Moon."

GM: Are you using any tricks to make him look bigger?

WG: There’s a lot of things you can do in terms of putting him in the foreground, raising him up, putting him on higher ground in certain scenes. From a body mass standpoint, we don’t have to do anything. He’s ripped like, to date myself, Marky Mark in 1991. At the end of the day, will people go, wait a minute, Jacob is described as 6’5’’ in the book and he’s clearly not 6’5’’? That’s movie license. At some point, you just have to go with it, but as a spirit, he’s embodied the change and I think that’s what’s important from a character standpoint. You see a transformation in Taylor as an actor from "Twilight" to "New Moon," which is, I think, going to blow people away.

GM: Catherine Hardwicke directed "Twilight"; Chris Weitz is directing "New Moon" and David Slade is directing the next movie, "Eclipse." What was the reason behind choosing different directors for each film in the series – was it simply a practical necessity to get the movies completed as quickly as possible?

WG: It’s also aesthetic. You’re locked into cast, you’re locked into location, you’re locked into the Pacific Northwest. The one thing you can do as a filmmaker is change directors and give it a different look, a different style, a different shooting style. The movies and the books are all very different in terms of what the core themes are. For us, the first one was obviously the hard one. The movie worked, Catherine’s great, how do we figure out how to hold this together? When that didn’t work out, we found fortunately a great director for "New Moon." Chris has been fabulous. He’s totally different from Catherine and great in his own ways. This movie will feel very different from "Twilight," but it’s still the world of "Twilight." It’s still the Pacific Northwest, it’s still your actors, all of that stuff which makes you connect to the consistency, but you allow for something exciting to happen to the audience because it’s a different style. With Chris moving onto David Slade, that is just purely practical. Chris can’t possibly cut the movie and have it ready for Nov. 20 and have the next one ready for June 30. We knew we needed a new director right away. David is going to embrace and embody the growth of narrative that happens in "Eclipse," the fact that it becomes the whole world crashing in on Forks, the Volturi, the newborn army in Seattle, there’s a lot of action that happens in that book and a lot of action that happens now that Edward’s back and all the Cullens are back. Edward and Jacob and Bella are in direct contact in a way that’s got much more tension. I think David was the right guy for that. He directed an amazing performance out of a young actress in Ellen Page in his first film "Hard Candy" and he also can handle the action and the style of action that we wanted to accomplish with "Eclipse."

GM: You mention "Hard Candy," which is an extremely edgy, R-rated film. Was there any concern that David Slade's sensibility might be too extreme for the world of "Twilight"?

WG: For me, no, because ever since I saw "Hard Candy," I was obsessed with him as a filmmaker. I’ve offered him five different movies. That’s a female point of view movie and it’s very different than the average female point of view movie. She’s incredibly empowered and yet she starts off as a victim. It’s a really well done narrative. He’s also done tons of videos that are female friendly, he has some teeth to him, too, which I think is good for the franchise. A movie franchise and a book franchise has to age with its audience. The same thing that works in "Twilight"... the girls that read "Twilight," by the time you’ve made "Eclipse" and have it in theaters, they’re older. You need the film to mature in the way the books mature. By the fourth book, Bella's getting married, getting pregnant, having babies.

GM: Speaking of the fourth book, what's the status of a "Breaking Dawn" movie?

WG: We all want to make "Breaking Dawn." We still have to get there. We’re focused right now on "New Moon" and "Eclipse," but everyone involved in the movies wants "Breaking Dawn" to happen. There are a lot of challenges to making "Breaking Dawn," and I think Stephenie’s at the forefront of really acknowledging, guys, let’s really be clear that we know how to do this before we move forward. I think it’s smart. It’s a little overwhelming to really think in a detailed manner of how we’re going to crack this but we have every intention to.

GM: What's the most interesting change you've witnessed on the part of the cast during the course of shooting "New Moon"?

WG: What’s really interesting is to watch how comfortable the actors have become in the characters' skin. A lot of the tension on the first movie was dealing with actors who were approaching these characters for the first time and in a weird way not knowing them as well as they now know them. I think Rob and Kristin and Taylor all feel pretty comfortable, they know the characters, they know the story. That’s been great. Taylor’s a real revelation in this. I think people are going to be excited about his performance. Kristen has taken it to a whole new level in terms of her commitment and her insight into the emotional nuances of the character.

You forget how emotional "New Moon" is. It’s not about plot. It’s about inner turmoil and despair and how do you handle that on a day to day basis. It’s been a really difficult role for her. I was just talking to the studio and saying there are going to be like five different scenes where you’re going to have to hand out Kleenex in the movie theater. There’s going to be five different scenes where people are going to be crying. It’s just so emotional. Everyone can relate to having that first, most vital love taken from you. To watch her go through it, puts you right back into that place where you first had your heart pulled out of your chest and stomped on. The movie and the book you get to see her reawaken and out of that comes growth, which is ultimately what "New Moon" is about.

-- Gina McIntyre

READ MORE OF OUR "TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

RECENT AND RELATED

"Twilight" screenwriter says second film is better

Stephenie Meyer breaks silence on "Oprah"

Vampy sounds: Todd Martens reviews "New Moon" soundtrack

'Twilight: New Moon' exclusive: Three dozen photos from the set

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'back-up plan'

Dan Radcliffe in "The Hobbit"? Star says thanks, but no thanks

Chris Columbus is 'like a proud parent' watching 'Harry Potter' stars from afar

Geoff Boucher — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:16:29 -0800

It's been a long time since director Chris Columbus was the cinematic headmaster at Hogwarts but he said it's been a joy to watch Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint graduate to bigger and better things.

"My biggest pride is seeing the pictures now, and watching the three of them from a distance, and seeing them do an entire scene in one shot," said the director of the first two "Harry Potter" films, which were released in 2001 and 2002. "Seriously, I know that sounds funny, but in the old days -- and, you know, the old days meaning eight years ago -- and in that first picture in particular, it’s filled with cuts because they couldn’t really get beyond the first line without either looking into the camera, laughing or looking at the lights."

I was talking to Columbus recently about his next film, "Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief," which is the adaptation of a series of novels about a young boy with an outsider spirit who discovers he has a magical heritage and then must fight against powerful foes with the help of his friends. Yes, it does sound a bit familiar, doesn't it?

"I know, I know, it’s the inevitable question on this picture," Columbus said with a chuckle. "We obviously would be fools not to hope for the same type of audience." He went on to explain the many differences between "Percy" and "Harry" but you can read about all of that in our coming-soon coverage of the "Lightning Thief" and its considerable aspirations. Today I'm focused instead on Columbus and his Hogwarts legacy.

The first two films are about to be front-and-center again too. On Dec. 8, two lavish new home-video collections hit stores: "Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone" Ultimate Edition and "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" Ultimate Edition, which arrive with a bundle of extras, including never-before-seen screen tests of the cast members and the first two installments of the new eight-part documentary "Creating the World of Harry Potter."

Columbus launched a franchise that has, in less than a decade, accounted for more than $5.3 billion in worldwide box-office, not to mention the billions more made at retail and through licensing deals. Columbus isn't hailed as a founding father by many fans, though; as the franchise has grown darker, more stylized and better-acted (if only due to the maturation of its young stars), the perception is that the Columbus films have not aged all that well. To me, they do feel overly quaint now and, at some wincing moments, have the soft-glow aura of a Hallmark commercial. I'm sure that sort of appraisal will sound a bit unfair to Columbus and his supporters -- they weren't trying to make "Let the Right One In" after all, it was a film for kids and about kids.

I remember earlier this year, "Potter" franchise producer David Heyman told me the best way to frame those first two films is to judge them by their pioneering impact, not as rivals to their sequels. "Chris Columbus was the exact right director for those films," he said, noting that Columbus is "unrivaled" in his ability to work with young children as stars. Indeed, Columbus may not have the storytelling chops of current "Potter" director David Yates but part of his job on the first two films was making sure his young stars were kept safe in the eye of the storm.

"Having done the 'Home Alone' pictures, I realized that we needed to start casting kids based on their families and the security that their families could give them at this particular time in their lives -- that was particularly the case with the "Potter" kids, who were about to become three of the most famous kids in the world," Columbus said. "So David Heyman and I made sort of a pact that we were gonna cast the families as well as the kids. And in interviewing Dan’s family and Rupert’s family and Emma’s family, they surrounded themselves with a really solid group of people. Their parents were very supportive, their parents were there for them all the time."

I told Columbus that the most amazing thing about the "Potter" stars may be how level-headed and thoughtful the trio are in the face of fame that has now lasted for half of their lifetimes. There's not a Britney in the bunch, I told Columbus and he agreed.

"There wasn’t this obsession for fame," the 51-year-old director said. "It all sort of happened -- particularly with Daniel Radcliffe -- reluctantly. With the other two kids it seemed accidentally – they weren’t expecting it. And I think as a result of that, because they had that sense of support from us at the beginning, and from their parents throughout, they’ve really turned into terrific adults. And that being said, they’ve also turned into terrific actors, you know. "

Debate, if you will, the quality of Columbus as a director but don't doubt for a minute his value to the franchise that is now a towering part of Hollywood history. "Boy, I’m telling you, to see them grow as actors and actually having the opportunity to see Dan in [the stage play] 'Equus'…I was just really, really impressed. It was the feeling of a proud parent."

-- Geoff Boucher

RECENT AND RELATED

Which celebrity intimidates Emma Watson? You may be surprised

Dumbledore diss? Michael Gambon sees "no point" in reading Rowling

Daniel Radcliffe talks about life after Hogwarts

Bush administration objected to "Potter" witchcraft themes

Rupert Grint explains the pain of love ... and quidditch

David Yates reveals where he will split "Deathly Hallows"

Jessie Cave spills about scaring, smooching Rupert Grint

QUIZ: How well do you know the halls of Hogwarts?

Getting to know the real-life Weasley boys

PHOTO: Rupert Grint, Daniel Radcliffe and Chris Columbus on the set of the first "Potter" film (Warner Bros.)

'Twilight' screenwriter says 'New Moon' is better than first: 'I know who I'm writing for'

Gina McIntyre — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:27:00 -0800

"TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

GM: So director Chris Weitz seems to run an incredibly relaxed set...

MR: This is a happy set. I was with him after delivering the first draft, we had a couple of meetings on the second draft and he was the same guy then as he is here on set. He didn’t suddenly turn into some maniac, stressed out and crazed. He’s really impressive. He’s just capturing every moment with the actors. I haven’t seen one wrong moment with the actors.

GM: What changes did you make to that first draft of "New Moon"?

MR: There was a lot of honing down, cutting down and eliminating certain scenes and pulling out certain elements of the story just to have it move faster.

GM: How challenging was it to adapt this book with the character of Edward Cullen being absent for so much of the story?

MR: Going in, that was going to be the issue. Not only Edward but the entire Cullen clan disappears, the vampires who you’ve come to know and love disappear throughout the middle of the book. In the book, Bella very much keeps them alive in her mind. He is a presence and because it’s all inside her mind, the reader is with him. The challenge here was how do I do that in a movie. I think we have found a way to stay true to the tone of the book and true to the intention of the book but to have him remain a physical presence as well. And you’re starting a whole new relationship with Jacob. Yes, there was a relationship with Jacob in "Twilight" but this is when it happens.

GM: What are some of the strengths of "New Moon" on the page?

MR: What’s so great about this story is Stephenie really explores complex emotions. You could boil it down to girl loses boy, finds boy, but she doesn’t do the easy, black-and-white moves that a lot of young romances do. It’s very complex -- [what happens when] you develop feelings for a friend, romantic love versus platonic love. These are very sophisticated emotions that are very real but also very hard to translate into a film where everything is usually very simplistic and easy to follow. How do you keep that sophistication and complexity? Because that's the book, that's what makes it interesting.

GM: So, how do you do that?

MR: Examining each moment for the character and keeping alive different facets. Of course, you have great actors who can play a lot of different colors. It’s really bringing to life and translating those different colors. You might have to cut down on a couple of those colors. When you’re writing a book you can have it be that in any one moment, Bella experiences 10 different things and does 10 different actions. OK, well, you’re going to have to choose, in that moment, maybe a couple of those colors and a couple of those emotions. You need to be able to track throughout the movie where she’s going. It’s hard to articulate because so much of it is just sort of instinctual -- does that feel right? I’m very much a structuralist. I think story is structure is story. If you have the correct structure, the moments of the story happen at the right time and you build those characters to those moments.

GM: How many different drafts of the screenplay did you write?

MR: You do so many drafts over the course of a script. I do very, very detailed outlines, like 25-page outlines. I’ll do any number of drafts and get feedback from a very big circle of writer friends and associates. Finally, I’ll have a draft that I think works. Then I give it to the producers and they give me notes and feedback. For me, a lot of the work happens in that outline stage because that’s when you’re going from blank page to here’s what we’re doing. Then, writing the script, you do more drafts. Again, I’ll have 10 different writer friends read it at any one given time. By the time the producers get it, it’s actually been honed quite a bit. It’s a lot like what directors do with test screenings to see how people respond to certain moments. I do a lot of that. I don’t know that all writers do that. It may be a habit from TV, just from working collaboratively with a lot of people, I’m used to getting instant reaction.

GM: You're also the executive producer of the great series "Dexter" on Showtime. Is the experience of writing these scripts at all like working in television?

MR: It becomes much more like writing for television where "Twilight" was the pilot and "New Moon" is the first episode. For instance, in "Twilight," I had no idea who was actually playing the roles. I tend to lean toward a lot more humor and I sometimes can go a little bit broad and quippy, or like "Dexter," the dark one-liners. I had a lot of that in the "Twilight" script and when it got onto the actors it wasn’t right for the tone. Some of that got pared out. I had not quite found the tone for "Twilight." There was some adjusting that had to be done as we went along. With "New Moon," it was much closer, the adjustments have not been as dramatic – not that they were that dramatic to begin with – but they’ve been subtler. I hope that for the next one, they’ll be even less dramatic. I think I’ve found my footing and I know who I’m writing for and the tone of the world.

GM: Did that make it easier to adapt "Eclipse"?

MR: "Eclipse" was hard – it took a while to break that, but part of that might have been that I was just so tired. I went from "Dexter" overlapping with "Twilight" to jumping back on "Dexter" to overlapping with "New Moon" and doing five days a week on "Dexter" and two days a week on "New Moon" and did that for months and months and went into "Eclipse." By then I was pretty burned. It took a while to stoke the fire again, and it’s a hard story to tell. You think it’s going to be easy because there’s all this action, but you realize that Bella is reactive a lot of the time. You can do that in a book because everything’s from her point of view so she’s very much present. But in a movie, you can’t have her just reacting. She has to be driving the action. Ultimately it may end up being the best of the three. You never know. I like to think that I improve with every round; it doesn’t necessarily always pan out that way.

GM: Do you feel free at all to take artistic license with the story?

MR: There are definitely scenes of my creation, but it’s become very hard to differentiate because so many of the scenes are compilations of five different scenes condensed into one. I’ll invent a scene and use a piece from something else. Or I’ll use something as a jumping-off point. I couldn’t tell you where the line between Stephenie and me is. I have to dive into the mind-set of her mythology to make sure that if I am inventing, it’s born out of her mythology and it’s not going to violate it. Her mythology is very tight, it’s very well thought-out. When you’re doing sci-fi or fantasy, the rules have to be very, very defined. But within those rules you have tremendous room for invention, that’s why it’s so fun. But that’s the difference between a successful fantasy or sci-fi series and an unsuccessful one is are the rules defined.

GM: Would you say that you have a close working relationship with Stephenie Meyer?

MR: In the first book, with "Twilight," I don’t think I even met her until I was well into a draft and I was worried about meeting her because she was the 500-pound gorilla, she was the heavyweight. I was really protective of my process. I was afraid. I didn’t know her from Adam, and I was afraid of getting run over and of not being able to create what I wanted to create or in some way have my voice stifled. When I met her, I realized, "Oh, that’s not going to happen at all." But she was cautious too. She was looking at me going, "Are you going to butcher my child?" By the time I finished "Twilight," her reaction to it, it was still one of the great moments of my career, having the author say such wonderful things about the script. From that moment she relaxed about can I deliver and I relaxed about inviting her into my process. I didn’t have a director of "New Moon" until I was finished, so on "New Moon" I became much more involved with her, and with "Eclipse" I was getting her notes on the outline. With "Eclipse," because I was taking some liberties with the storytelling, it was really important to me that I stay true to her mythology, her voice. She gave me notes as far back as the outline and on every draft since. We’re very tight and very much in each other’s world.

-- Gina McIntyre

READ MORE OF OUR "TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

RECENT AND RELATED

Stephenie Meyer breaks silence on "Oprah"

Vampy sounds: Todd Martens reviews "New Moon" soundtrack

'Twilight: New Moon' exclusive: Three dozen photos from the set

Stephenie Meyer is immortalized...in a comic book

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'back-up plan'

Sam Worthington looks for the humanity of "Avatar": "I don't want to be a cartoon"

PHOTOS: Top, Edward and Bella from "New Moon" (Summit Entertainment). Middle, Melissa Rosenberg last month at 4th International Rome Film Festival (Getty Images). Bottom, Taylor Lautner, Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson at Comic-Con International (Chelsea Warren/Wire Image)

'Avatar' director James Cameron as cinema prophet: 'Moving a mountain is nothing'

Geoff Boucher — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:34:34 -0800

Epic or epic failure? Game changer or the Great Hype Machine? All eyes are on "Avatar," and two of the top reporters in Hollywood, John Horn and Claudia Eller, check in with a survey of the sensation in a story that ran on the front page of today's Los Angeles Times. Here's an excerpt. -- Geoff Boucher

Inside a dark mixing stage at 20th Century Fox a few weeks ago, writer-director James Cameron, surrounded by nearly a dozen colleagues, stared at a clip from his upcoming movie, "Avatar," unhappy with the look of the precipitous peaks on the horizon.

Circling the summits with a red laser pointer and speaking to his computer-effects team at Weta Digital in New Zealand via videoconference, Cameron came up with a Muhammad-like solution: Shift the mountains to the left.

"Moving a mountain," the 55-year-old filmmaker said, laughing, "is nothing."

Such bravado might be expected from the man who declared, "I'm the king of the world!" during the Academy Awards 11 years ago, when his last feature film, "Titanic," collected 11 Oscars. It was the highest-grossing movie in cinema history.

Throughout his career, in films such as "Terminator 2: Judgment Day" and "The Abyss," Cameron has used eye-popping digital effects to create worlds and characters. But he never has attempted anything as creatively and commercially ambitious as "Avatar," a groundbreaking combination of 3-D filmmaking, photo-realistic computer animation and live-action drama that opens Dec. 18.

"Avatar," a futuristic thriller, may be Hollywood's most expensive movie ever, and many in the industry fervently hope it will transform 21st century moviemaking the way sound and color did decades ago.

The film business, struggling with flat theater attendance, collapsing DVD sales and the serial firing of top executives, certainly could use a game changer -- an immersive moviegoing experience that delivers more than anyone can get from their HDTV or home computer screens. But though "Avatar" might be all that, it also defies conventional Hollywood wisdom that today's blockbuster movies need to be "pre-sold" as bestsellers ("Harry Potter," "The Lord of the Rings"), comic books ("Batman," "X-Men"), toys ("Transformers," the upcoming "Battleship") or based on other movies (every sequel ever made).

Thus the novelty of "Avatar" could also be its biggest liability. And some wonder if the film's plot -- dense with action sequences and special effects, but also featuring a love story between two 10-foot-tall blue aliens -- will resonate with a wide enough audience to steer the movie into profitability.

Hollywood has tracked "Avatar" closely. Many of Cameron's friends -- members of a filmmaking elite that includes Steven Spielberg, Peter Jackson and Ridley Scott -- made pilgrimages to his Santa Monica production house and the Playa del Rey hangars where he worked on the film.

"I was blown away," said Guillermo del Toro, director of "Pan's Labyrinth" and the upcoming "Hobbit" movies. "The creation of this technology is what allows a movie like 'Avatar' to exist."

Said Jim Gianopulos, co-chairman of Fox Filmed Entertainment: "He gets to the edge of the envelope, and then goes as far past it as possible."

To observe Cameron directing "Avatar" is to witness filmmaking as it's never been done before. Whereas most movies add all of their visual effects in post-production, Cameron was able to see fully composited shots in real time: The actors he was directing may have been performing in front of a blank green screen, but Cameron's camera eyepiece -- not to mention giant 3-D television monitors -- immediately displayed lush, synthetic backgrounds.

The filmmaker has spent the better part of a decade developing the technology used in "Avatar," which is set on a distant moon under siege by humans determined to pillage its natural resources. It required the reinvention of bulky 3-D cameras, which had to be downsized to fit into smaller spaces and move with fluidity, and lengthy experimentation with improvements in motion-capture animation, which superimposes animated characters onto real actors, as in the current Disney version of "A Christmas Carol."

As part of his research and development, Cameron directed the 3-D documentaries "Aliens of the Deep" and "Ghosts of the Abyss," which visited the Titanic's underwater wreckage. To overcome what many critics regard as the great flaw of motion-capture animation, the "dead-eye" appearance of characters, Cameron mounted tiny cameras above the faces of his "Avatar" actors, recording their smallest facial expressions and most intimate eye movements.

"What had been missing in motion capture was the 'E' -- the emotion," said "Avatar" producer Jon Landau.

THERE'S MORE, READ THE REST.

-- John Horn and Claudia Eller

RECENT AND RELATED

James Cameron on "Avatar": Like "Matrix," it opens doorways

Welcome to the jungle: Mixed reaction to "Avatar" trailer

VIDEO: "Avatar" interviews with Sigourney Weaver and Jon Landau

"Avatar" coming to a theater near you . . . and sooner than you think

Peter Jackson: Movie fans are fed up with the lack of original ideas

The late Stan Winston and the tricky business of Legacy

The Del Toro decade? Guillermo on "The Hobbit" and more

Photo: Filmmaker James Cameron with actors Sigourney Weaver, Joel Moore, center, and Sam Worthington. Credit: Mark Fellman / 20th Century Fox

Robert Pattinson, object of obsession

Yvonne Villarreal — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:01:40 -0800

"TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

Yvonne Villarreal is a contributor to Hero Complex who may or may not be obsessed with a certain actor who appears in "The Twilight Saga: New Moon," which opens Friday. She sent in this report on a new documentary that promises "All Areas Accessed."

I've been doing my homework with the new breathless documentary "Robsessed."

For instance, I now know that when Robert Pattinson was a child, his sisters dressed him up in girls' clothes and called him Clare.

I also know that Rob is the youngest of three kids, that his father imported vintage cars from the States and that his mum pulled a paycheck as the booker at a model agency. This is important stuff here, revelatory factoids that will help me prepare the all-important small talk when Rob brings me home to meet his parents.

People make fun of Rob's disheveled hair, but it's gorgeous chaos if you ask me. It's more than mere fashion affectation -- "Robsessed" reveals that Rob once won an award at school for the messiest desk. That makes me think he's a naturally rough-around the-edges soul. It also makes me wonder whether I should have gone to school in England.

Rob was born on May 13, which means he shares a birthday with Stevie Wonder, "Maude" actress Bea Arthur, boxing legend Joe Louis and cult leader Jim Jones, but he has much better hair than any of those people. His middle name is Thomas, which is much better than Clare.

The 70-minute "Robsessed" was directed by Irene Antoniades, who apparently couldn't get people who know Rob well to sit down for extended interviews. Most of the screen time is given to British magazine editors who’ve had brief encounters with the actor. There are interviews with his acting teacher and former costar Anne Reid ("The Bad Mother's Handbook") but no childhood friends nor any old girlfriends who might have broken up with him (maybe they're all locked up in insane asylums). A woman who once saw him at a pub gets some air time, which suggests that this isn't exatcly a Ken Burns production. I myself am not in it, but other “superfans” offer their expert opinion on his dreaminess.

It's not all sunny tidbits: It shows that Rob was cast to play Reese Witherspoon’s son in 2004’s "Vanity Fair," but his scenes were -- gasp! -- cut out. And British film critic Kim Newman makes some intelligent points, suggesting the hysteria surrounding Pattinson has more to do with the Edward Cullen than the actor himself. Yeah, right. Put Carrot Top in the movie and girls would be chasing him down the street, too...

I can recommend "Robsessed" because it also includes some early modeling shots of Pattinson in boxer shorts and black socks. The movie also devotes screen time to an in-depth analysis of Rob's famous coif -- which it weirdly describes as “finger-lickingly good hair”? I can't wait to ask him about that one.

-- Yvonne Villarreal

RECENT AND RELATED

Stephenie Meyer breaks silence on "Oprah"

Vampy sounds: Todd Martens reviews "New Moon" soundtrack

'Twilight: New Moon' exclusive: Three dozen photos from the set

Stephenie Meyer is immortalized...in a comic book

'Vampire Diaries' and Hollywood's undying love for fang fantasy

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'back-up plan'

Opening day: '2012' looking huge, 'Christmas Carol' holding strong

Photo credit: Revolver Entertainment

'2012' has great effects and (shocker!) inept writing

Geoff Boucher — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:11:22 -0800

Los Angeles Times senior film critic Kenneth Turan sat through a popcorn apocalypse. Here's his review, with a few links added by me. -- Geoff Boucher

As far as the new disaster film "2012" is concerned, the world will end with both a bang and a whimper, the bang of undeniably impressive special effects and the whimper of inept writing and characterization. You pays your money, you takes your chances.

In fact, it's hard to say what leaves the more lasting impression, how realistically director Roland Emmerich has destroyed Los Angeles (it's the third try, after "Independence Day" and "The Day After Tomorrow," practice apparently making perfect) or how difficult a time the actors have bringing any life to the script by Emmerich and Harald Kloser.

Nothing, not even a season of Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, will give you more respect for how difficult it is to be an actor than watching top talent like John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet and Oliver Platt struggling to treat the film's ungodly language and situations with perfect seriousness.

The deeper truth, of course, is that it doesn't really matter and everyone with a hand in "2012" knows as much. Audiences with a hankering for the apocalypse shrug off the ridiculous and sit tight for the special effects. In this case, they are worth the wait.

THERE'S MORE, READ THE REST

-- Kenneth Turan

RECENT AND RELATED

Roland Emmerich on L.A.: "It's always fun to lay it to ruin"

"2012" poised for a big weekend at international box-office

Scientists fuming about "2012" hysteria

Roland Emmerich promises "2012" is the "mother of all disaster films"

PHOTOS: David Strick on the set of "2012"

The mysterious messages of "2012"

James Cameron: Yes, "Avatar" is "Dances With Wolves" in space...sorta

Well 'Twilight' fans, how was Stephenie Meyers' 'Oprah' appearance for you?

Denise Martin — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:24:40 -0800

"TWILIGHT: NEW MOON" COUNTDOWN

Denise Martin, one of our "Twilight" experts, checks in with some thoughts on today's vampy edition of "The Oprah Winfrey Show"...

That certainly wasn't aimed at Twi-hards, was it?

After more than a year of forgoing all interview requests, Stephenie Meyer emerged to promote the upcoming "New Moon" movie on "The Oprah Winfrey Show."

Her pre-taped appearance aired Friday and yielded, for rabid "Twilight" fans, just one revelation not already known about her vampire series. For the second book, (the film version hits theaters Nov. 20), Meyer said, she originally had a different ending in mind.

"There was a different ending to 'New Moon.' Originally it was much quieter [and took place] in Bella's head," she said. Meyer changed it at the urging of her mom, Candy Morgan. She introduced the Volturi earlier, and — voila! — a Volturi smack-down jazzes up the end. Thanks, Candy.

Otherwise, Oprah and Meyer went over very familiar territory: "Twilight" came to Meyer in a dream; she imagined a hot vampire who was in love with a mortal girl; she wanted to know more; that dream became Chapter 13 of "Twilight."

"In the dream it was two people in a circular meadow and one of them was a sparkly boy and one was just a girl who was human and normal and the boy was a vampire, which was bizarre," Meyer said. "It was a passion and frenzy when I started writing."

And of course, there was a question about Robert Pattinson. His hygiene having often been called into question, Oprah wanted to know, "What does he smell like?" "He smells great," Meyer said. "Rob is hilarious. He is the funniest person. He's not at all like the Edward character. He's so different. He just doesn't look like anyone else, in a good way. He's very striking looking."

And that was about it. So what do you all think? Do you wish Meyer could have done, say, a more in-depth interview? Or talked more about the "New Moon" movie? Or, at the very least, told us what she's been up to all year? (I do!) Agree with me, or disagree if you must, below.

— Denise Martin

RECENT AND RELATED

Vampy sounds: Todd Martens reviews "New Moon" soundtrack

'Twilight: New Moon' exclusive: Three dozen photos from the set

Stephenie Meyer is immortalized...in a comic book

'Vampire Diaries' and Hollywood's undying love for fang fantasy

Report from Forks, Wash., the 'Twilight' town

Robert Pattinson talks about his career 'back-up plan'